![]() |
||||||
|
Amazing Discoveries | Walter Veith | Victor Gill » Amazing Discoveries Library | Online Library and Reference Books » Journals » Magazine Archive » Magazine Archive 2002 » Spring 2002 » Spring 2002 Newsletter: Reflections on the Waldenses
For, there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus (1 Timothy 2:5). This was the Bible verse written above the door of the 16th century Waldensian church I visited in the Alps of Italy. In every age there have been men and women willing to suffer extreme hardship in order to maintain the simple Bible faith in its purity. The grand offense of these Waldenses was that they would not worship God according to the will of the Church of Rome. They would not accept a "Thus saith the Church" for a "Thus saith the Lord." For this they were branded as heretics, their motives attacked, their characters maligned, their writings suppressed, misrepresented, and mutilated. Persecuted and oppressed for hundreds of years, they found refuge behind the lofty bulwarks of the mountains in northern Italy. Here they maintained, at great peril and hardship, the ancient faith of the apostles. It was largely in fleeing from the power of the Church of Rome that they preserved their freedom to worship God in the liberty of their consciences. The Church of Rome wanted to usurp the position of Christ as mediator between God and these simple people. She wanted them to look to her, to follow her self-created guidelines. She wanted to be a conscience for these people, to raise her authority above the authority of God's Word. But the Waldenses, in their purity and simplicity, rejected the supremacy of the Church of Rome and held to the Bible as the only supreme infallible authority and the rule of life and faith. The Waldenses were determined to maintain their allegiance to God and to preserve the right of their individual liberty of conscience. Thus an inevitable separation took place. But I ask you, which group was the separatist? Was it the Waldensian people who continued to worship God inspirit and truth? Or was it the Church of Rome with all her self-made guidelines, rules, and regulations? Who was the most dependent on God? It was the proud hierarchical Church of Rome that was the schismatic and not the Church in the Wilderness. It was the Church of Rome that left off her dependence upon God and His Word and became the most independent of all. I was raised in this Church of Rome, was taught from the catechism rather than the Bible, confessed my sins to a priest rather than to God, prayed to Mary rather than to Christ, attended church on Sunday instead of Sabbath, refrained from eating meat on Fridays, used holy water to sanctify myself, paid money to get souls out of purgatory, got absolution from a priest to break what I thought was the law of God, prayed “Hail Marys” for the forgiveness of sins, and kissed the bishop’s ring on my confirmation day.
In short, I grew up with the understanding, belief, and practice that the authority of the Church superseded that of the Scriptures. Thus my religion was made up of externals. There was no real heart conversion, no true trusting in Christ as my daily mediator and His Word as a sure path unto my feet.
After thorough study for over 18 months, we decided to join God's remnant Church. No longer would it be necessary to blindly follow the counsels and decrees of humanity, or to substitute the Church for my mediator. Everything would be put to the test of God's Word. Sola Scriptura would be our rule of faith. One might ask why we didn't join the Waldensian Church, the Church that maintained the ancient faith for a thousand years? The Church that longer than any other church lived out the simple pure faith of Christ and held the Bible as the only supreme, infallible authority, for its life and faith. It grieves my heart to tell you this but this Church in the Wilderness eventually gave Christ up as her only mediator and agreed to accept human guidelines from the Church of Rome in order to secure human peace. But friends, these concessions could not be substantiated from the Word of God. Thus the Waldenses allowed the Church of Rome to become the mediator between them and God. It is thus that the pure Church fell and today, if you would visit a Waldensian church, you would find a nominal profession and a dry formality. How terribly sad have been the results of that one unfavorable moment and decision. Today, she has lost that purity and simplicity that she held. For a thousand years, the Waldenses preferred to submit to the loss of their properties and even their lives and children's lives, than to sanction the mingling of human requirements with divine precepts. But they were tired, and the Church of Rome offered them a favor, one which was in reality always their divine right. What was this favor granted them? Namely, the liberty of Protestant worship within their territorial limits. In exchange for this favor, the Waldenses had to, among other things, agree to banish their leader Henri Arnaud and other faithful shepherds into exile. They were forbidden to evangelize or make converts. They were forbidden to have a printing press. And they were forbidden to sell or even lend their books to a Roman Catholic (See History of the Waldenses by J. A. Wylie).
In short, many of the duties, rights, and privileges that constitute the Christian life were denied them. Thus the spiritual condition of the Waldensians languished. Though the hand of bloody persecution could no more be placed on them, they were now more captive than when they were hunted and treated as animals. |
||||||
|
Rekindling the Reformation - Peace if Possible, Truth at All Costs © Copyright 2008.
Sponsored by Amazing Discoveries |
||||||